Monday, 31 January 2011

Who should decide if a pub stays or goes?

Something came through the post that made me drop my coffee last week. Now recently I've done a bit of CAMRA bashing, but after this I really am doubting how much I want to stay involved. I've been asked to help organise one of their beer festivals, which is good fun, but I'm finding myself disagreeing with them on more and more subjects recently.

The Rhydspence Inn is a local coaching inn - a lovely looking black and white tucked off the main road from Brecon to Hereford. It's not in a town, village or even hamlet - just four houses are in the area.

The owner has been trying to sell it for several years, with very little interest apparently. Having reduced the asking price several times, he's now decided to apply for a change of use to a private dwelling. He's just had enough of the trade and wants to retire.

The following letter came through regarding this at the end of last week from Herefordshire CAMRA:
EDIT: I've now had time to re-type my main points throughout their letter in blue:




The Rhydspence Inn is on the main A438 Hereford-Brecon road, just beyond
Whitney-on-Wye. It is one of the most historic inns in Herefordshire and
the UK, with parts dating back to 1380. The pub's website suggests
it has been a hostelry continuously from day one, and at one time would
have been frequented by the sheep drovers who passed through this part
of the world. Have a look at the pub's website at
will get a flavour of what this pub is about. Two images have been
posted into the 'Photos' section of camrawm Yahoo!Group site.

This Grade-II listed timber-framed building has many charming original
features, including fine fireplaces and settles, and has always been a
landmark pub of great character and distinction. It enjoys scenic views,
and commands a great position on the main A438. Located nearby is the
fashionable and popular town of Hay-on-Wye, with its
internationally-renowned festival.

But now its owner has submitted a planning application to Herefordshire Council
seeking to convert the Rhydspence Inn into a private dwelling. To
justify this, he states that his business is no longer financially
viable and that no-one has expressed an interest in buying the pub,
despite it being on the market for a number of years.

VIABILITY - HIS BUSINESS MIGHT NOT WORK, BUT WHAT ABOUT OTHERS?

With these strong attributes in its favour, it is our view that it is
not credible to suggest that the pub is not viable. 

So a consumer organisation knows more about the viability of the business than the owner? The guy who's been running it for years, with access to GPs, turnovers, general trends? In the 4 years I've been in Hay the price of a pint of Butty has raised from £2.60 to £3.10 - that's just one example of the big changes that have taken place in the last 4 years. You've also just called the landlord a liar ('not credible').

Whilst it should be
acknowledged that the present owner's business is no longer viable
(probably not helped by his personal circumstances - the impact of these
can be seen by looking up the inn on the Trip Advisor website), we
believe that a new operator could make a real go of the business. 

Having checked the Trip Advisor website, 7 out of 10 reviews recommend the place. The first negative review was from a gent who sees no problem arriving 40 minutes early for food, allows his self-confessed blind mum order a fish dish  full of small bones and doesn't send back a rack of lamb that must have cost £15 at a bare minimum. I could believe most CAMRA members wouldn't have an issue sending back a £3 pint of ale they weren't happy with.

It
just needs some TLC, a warm welcome and updating to tap into lucrative
markets such as out-of-town fine-dining, and accommodation for the likes
of the Hay Literary and Brecon Jazz festivals. The locals' trade
that has been allowed to die off can also be re-invigorated.

You do it then. Put your money where your mouth is - you make it sound so easy. It comes across as bloody dismissive of the hard work all the licensees in the area (and further) put in just to keep their doors open. As for the locals trade, have a look at this google map that shows you just how many 'locals' the pub has.
I'll give you a clue, it's the same as 2 couples...


EFFORTS TO SELL THE PUB NOT GENUINE

The pub has been on the market for a number of years - at an asking
price steadfastly in excess of £750,000 freehold. That is an
astronomical amount of money, and it is unlikely that any licensed
establishment in Herefordshire could justify this asking price. 

I know of at least 2 pubs sold in excess of this price. Given the original asking price was around the £900 000 he's reduced it a fair bit so far. But this just shows how little research has been done to find out other pub prices in the area. Speaking of which:

Our view
that it is grossly over-priced is shared by others in the trade, and
will be highlighted (with full supporting evidence) in the CAMRA report
to the Herefordshire Council planners. Doubtless this unrealistic asking
price has deterred potential buyers, thus the owner claims "no-one
is interested in the business." This does not constitute a genuine
attempt to sell the business or justify converting the pub into a
dwelling.


Who are these 'others in the trade'? And by saying 'others' do you consider yourself to be 'in the trade'? Now your telling us as a matter of fact that this asking price is 'unrealistic' - your yet to prove it. The final sentence is missing a few words: In CAMRA's Opinion

QUESTION NEEDS TO BE ANSWERED

We must make sure that before consideration is given to an alternative
use for the building that it has been genuinely marketed at a realistic
price. CAMRA believes that this has not been done, therefore to grant
planning permission would be highly inappropriate. We need to ask the
Council planners whether they believe the pub has been marketed
appropriately to attract a buyer.

But you've made it perfectly clear, presenting as factual, that it hasn't been marketed appropriately. So you don't need to ask, you need to them that in your highest-of-high opinions 'to grant planning permission would be highly inappropriate'.

ACT NOW!

If there was only ever going to be one time in your life that you were
prepared to write a letter (or e-mail) to the Council planners then this
should be it. We cannot allow such an important pub, with such history
and potential, to be killed off like this. If we lose the Rhydspence Inn
then a precedent might be set meaning that none of our pubs would be
safe from speculation in the future.

How you can help?

* If you get the opportunity, please visit the Rhydspence Inn -
it isn't far from Almeley, where we have our next branch
meeting on the 26th January.

Ah, about this 'important' pub. How many times has Hereford CAMRA arranged a trip to it? How many of their members have submitted NBSS scores on it? Surely such an important pub is worthy of a CAMRA meeting? Nope...

* Please write to or e-mail the Council stating that you wish to
object and your reasons why. You must include your name and address
for your objection to be valid. If you can relate to times you have
visited the pub, then that would be useful. You do not need to say
you are a member of CAMRA, but you can if you wish. Whatever you
write it doesn't need to be long, but please do USE YOUR OWN
WORDS.

That would be useful? Surely visiting the pub is essential to prove how important it is? The council wouldn't accept a load of emails saying 'we've never been, but...' would they?

* Send your e-mail to Phillip Mullineux at
pmullineux@herefordshire.gov.uk , quoting reference DMN/103369/F.
Alternatively, you can write to:
Herefordshire Council Planning Services, PO Box 230,
Blueschool House, Blueschool Street, HEREFORD, HR1 2ZB.

* To view the application and make an online submission visit
the Council planning website -
If this link does not work then
navigate to the `View Planning Applications' page and input
the reference 103369, or postcode HR3 6EU.

RESPONSES MUST BE SUBMITTED BY THE 9TH FEBRUARY 2011
[/end]

I fully dissected this on their forum, to very little response so far. My locals went in Saturday night to see the landlord, and because  of the way he's been portrayed in this release he wont be opening again in the near future. 

I haven't the time to go through the many reasons why I hate this piece, I'll do that later. But one idea I do want to leave you with - if CAMRA believes so strongly that a pub should remain open as a pub, they should stump up the cash and run it themselves. If they really think it's so easy at a time when over 30 pubs a week are closing, in an area saturated with pubs (and destination pubs at that) then they are being bloody rude not just to the licensee, but to all licensees working their arses off to keep their businesses going.

17 comments:

  1. If the pub has been in decline, for whatever reasons, finding a buyer to take on the business during a recession (sorry, credit crunch) is going to be difficult. Banks are unlikely to lend money to the venture and pubcos are likely to be wary.

    Improving the customer service, if it truly has slipped, is often not enough to turn a failing business around.

    Suggesting that the business owner is not really trying to sell up is utterly ridiculous.

    Whoever sent you that email should be ashamed of themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  2. CAMRA used to run pubs. It was in the 1970s/80s and were eventually sold to Midsummer Leisure. Can you imagine CAMRA committees running pubs? They would be debatting what colour of toilet paper to have until the early mornings.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The piece is confrontational and you can understand the Landlords negative reaction. I gather many CAMRA members agree only in part with what CAMRA do and presumably they are happy to be involved in what they like and oppose what they don't. Involvement in a beer festival is actual campaigning for real ale in so far as it is an opportunity to share your love of pongy ale with all that attend. It is one activity of CAMRA I very much respect.

    On the issue of the pub, my opinion is that it belongs to the Landlord to do with as he wishes. He has no obligation to sell it as a pub. An efficient market utilizes resources at their highest value, and if it is worth more as housing then that is the market. Planning regulations, however, exist and that is the law. If there is a legal case then CAMRA are within their rights to pursue it, but I see your point as it is your contribution to funds that are being used towards something you do not like.

    In such circumstances your choice is to leave or to stay and argue your case.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I would imagine that the CAMRA branch knows it has a bit of a case and has looked carefully at this. If it is just a blanket thing, its "evidence" and objection will be ignored and would be counter productive. If you are a local member did you go along to the meeting to discuss it? It's all very well to criticise, but if you are a non attending member, you can't really say you did enough to set them on the right track if you believe this is the wrong one.

    Hard to say what the truth of this is, but the ability of anyone to object to change of use is a fundamental democratic one.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I register my objection to a change of use of Tandy's blog from pongy ale to German lout. It is my democratic right.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I register my right to turn Cookie's next door neighbours houses on each side of him into pig farms.

    He won't object.(-;

    ReplyDelete
  7. A fair point Tand, but a law that allows me to protect the value of my property isn't there to diminish the value of another. This guy may have a building worth three quarters of a million as housing, or only a quarter of a million as a pub. Whatever he does with it isn't going to generate the smell of pig shit.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What if he turns it into a pig farm?

    ReplyDelete
  9. CAMRA are not objecting to what it will become, but what it will no longer be. Residents have a right to complain about it becoming a pig farm if that is the owners intent, I see little validity in complaining it will no longer be a pub. Board the place up for six months, after it becomes an eyesore residents will welcome some nice new flats.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I thought this was going far too well...

    @MW Sadly it wasn't an email, it was a letter sent out to many. I'm curious as to how much time was spent talking to the landlord, visiting the pub, etc etc. I'll edit the post with my breakdown of it after work.

    @BW I'd love to see a CAMRA run pub. Obviously it would be so good it would win POTY every year surely.

    @Tand I haven't been to any of the meetings, they are never in this neck of the woods and driving to Hereford to nurse a pint of ale is not the best use of my limited free time IMO. I'm more active in the Brecknock branch, seeing as I'm right on the border but they are more approachable and more supportive of Kilverts (You know, little things like turning up to the beer festival I put on and invited them to the trade session of).

    @Cookie, as always you have a way of cutting through the (pig)crap and getting down to the basics.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Cookie is probably right enough, but I was making a more general point I suppose.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Is there anything to stop someone buying it as a pub and then just not opening it to the public? I mean, you can live in a pub and I doubt there is any law as to how much of a pub can be taken up by the landlords private residence.

    You could convert it to a home, with a token bar at the front. Two barstools, one beer tap, an empty till and a single unisex toilet.

    There is no reason you couldn't use the space as a home bar, library and TV room with a downstairs toilet attached. It's still a pub, but you just don't open the door to the public.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Updated with my thoughts on the matter.

    @SB - your completely right. But I believe it would still have commercial rates, suppliers (elec/gas/water) and other over heads that would make it an expensive 'house'

    ReplyDelete
  14. Ah, I see the downside. Mind you, if the change of use application was turned down due to objections by people who want it to stay a pub, a couple of years without the doors opening might make them care less the next time you apply.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Whilst being aware you've revised this I'd be interested in a part 2 of this post. An update whether you made a case to your CAMRA branch, whether it was the tone or principle of the letter that you thought wrong, and whether you are still a member of the beardie club. If you do go along, make sure you count the sandals.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hi Everyone,
    As someone connected to the Rhydspence it is refreshing to see some people thinking freely, unlike most Camra members who cannot see anything beyond the end of their glass.

    Whilst the planning office states that public consultation ended on the 9th Febuary this just means that after this date you are not allowed to speak at a planning meeting. Letters of support or complaint can still be sent up and will be considered up until the decision is made.

    If you feel the same way that I do and are outraged at how someone from Kent who doesn't even know the Rhydspence can write viscous complaint letters and make hurtful personal accusations at a family who has put 25 years into the business - then please go to the link below and write a quick letter of support.

    http://www.herefordshire.gov.uk/planningpub/planDetail.aspx?ApplicationId=103369&FullAppId=N103369/F

    This link may not work as the blog software cuts out the middle bit. if so, go to http://www.herefordshire.gov.uk/planningpub/planQuery.aspx and enter 103369 into the search box.

    If you have similiar friends who share your same views on the treatment the owner is recieving then please ask them for their support.

    Thank you all for your support time.

    Best regards
    James

    ReplyDelete
  17. I have only just read Eds blog but agree wholeheartedly with his comments. Our family had the same problem with Herefordshire CAMRA. Fortunately the independent Planning Inspector totally ignored the spurious and untruthful remarks of CAMRA and granted us consent for change of use to a house.

    I hope common sense prevails and Peter Glover obtains his consent.

    Charles

    ReplyDelete

By all means!